Citing Preemption, Court Dismisses Claims That Surgical Clip Maker Failed To Report Adverse Events

Oops! Subscribers must be logged in to access this content.

Not A Thompson FDA Subscriber?

Unlock access to the benefits below with a no-cost, risk-free trial of the FDA Compliance Expert Suite.

Subscription Benefits

Start Your Free Trial

By signing up for a tour of the Thompson FDA Compliance Expert Suite, you are also registering to receive email offers and product updates from us. Simply click unsubscribe at the bottom of any email if you would like to discontinue delivery.

Citing Preemption, Court Dismisses Claims That Surgical Clip Maker Failed To Report Adverse Events

Dennis Tosh

February 22, 2023 at 01:28 PM EST

A federal district court in North Carolina has dismissed a complaint filed by a patient against the manufacturer and the distributors of a device used in tubal ligation surgeries, holding that the plaintiff’s state law claims were preempted by federal law (Watters v. Coopersurgical, Inc., No. 5:22-cv-223-D, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24056, 2023 WL 1982347 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2023))... Read More

My Research Folders

You are not Logged in yet, Please login to see Your research folders.

Oops! Subscribers must be logged in to access this content.

Not A Thompson FDA Subscriber?

Unlock access to the benefits below with a no-cost, risk-free trial of the FDA Compliance Expert Suite.

Subscription Benefits

Start Your Free Trial

Citing Preemption, Court Dismisses Claims That Surgical Clip Maker Failed To Report Adverse Events

My Research Folders

THOMPSON FDA

COMPLIANCE EXPERT

RESOURCES

HELP

CONTACT